Monday, February 20, 2006
Re: st: non-parametric tests
On 17 Feabh 2006, at 15:45, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> Dear all, > we ran an experiment where we asked people how many tasks they > wanted to > carry out under two different contracts. We ran both the Wilcoxon > and the > Sign tests on that data. I think that both tests check whether people > prefer working more under one of the two contracts. Probably, the > Wilcoxon > test takes the magnitude of the difference into account, while the > sign > test does not. Am I right? > If so, what does it mean if the difference between people’s effort in > contract A and in contract B is significant when I run the Wilcoxon > test > but not when I consider the Sign test? In my mind, the opposite > would be > more plausible…What’s the matter with my conclusions? > Thank you very much for your help
The sign test is a pretty hopless test that loses almost all the information in your data, reducing all differences to positive or negative. I'm not sure it's been used in real life in a while. Go with Wilcoxon.
The same applies to the queries in your other two emails.
Ronán Conroy email@example.com
* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
Links to this post: