Thursday, March 16, 2006
Re: st: Missing F-Statistics in estimation results, why?
Thanks for pointing this out. I had no idea as I was saving my results in log. I didn't used to understand why smcl is introduced, now I do!
On 3/16/06, Austin Nichols <email@example.com> wrote: > If you are running Stat in a windowed environment, I am guessing that > the "F(n1,n2)=" that precedes the "." appears in a color differing > from surrounding output, indicating that if you click on it, it will > take you to -help j_robustsingular- > > On 3/16/06, Ada Ma <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > > I have estimated some equations both with and without weights, and > > while the unweighted version gives the F-Statistics at the top of the > > results, the weighted version doesn't (it shows a "."). > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ >
-- Ada Ma Research Fellow Health Economics Research Unit University of Aberdeen, UK. http://www.abdn.ac.uk/heru/ Tel: +44 (0) 1224 553863 Fax: +44 (0) 1224 550926
* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
Links to this post: