Saturday, March 11, 2006

Re: st: TSCS: what model for N>T ??

Thanks Clive. My comments wasn�t intended as a slight on any previous responses - its just that you answered my question in a way I could understand easily. For us non-statisticians it can be hard to find the wood for the trees when trying to do this kind of work. And I have waded through probably a dozen articles on TSCS without finding (or understanding) an answer to this problem. But I will try to track down those Beck and Katz articles. Thanks again. Joel.

>From: "Clive Nicholas" <> >Reply-To: >To: >Subject: Re: st: TSCS: what model for N>T ?? >Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 20:07:10 -0000 (GMT) > >Joel Miller replied: > > > That�s the kind of response I was hoping to get! > >That's very kind of you, but it's also slighty unfair to the response >David Greenberg gave to you. He's right: you really should go the extra >mile to check out all the Beck/Katz references on this (and the one I >cited). If they're not immediately accessible to you, think laterally and >find another way! > >CLIVE NICHOLAS |t: 0(044)7903 397793 >Politics |e: >Newcastle University | > >Whereever you go and whatever you do, just remember this. No matter how >many like you, admire you, love you or adore you, the number of people >turning up to your funeral will be largely determined by local weather >conditions. > >* >* For searches and help try: >* >* >*

* * For searches and help try: * * *


Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?