Sunday, March 05, 2006
st: RE: RE: numlist abbreviations not at all interpreted differently in egenmore's eqany S8
Thanks very much for the explanation - I'm sorry for the delay in my thanks, but I was out of town.
I did consult -help numlist- and [U]14.1.8 before writing, I promise, but plain failed to see that the interval was dictated by the number listed before the range for 'to' and ':'. Boneheaded, indeed - I think I misread all the pertinent examples because I expected all but the explicit interval definition (e.g. 1100) to be simple range delimiters.
Thank you again.
-----Original Message----- From:On Behalf Of Scott Merryman Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 6:48 PM To: email@example.com Subject: st: RE: numlist abbreviations interpreted differently in egenmore's eqany S8?
> > Aren't these supposed to be the same? >
No. For the ":" and "to" syntax, the preceding number specify the interval used in constructing the number list.
10 15 to 25 == 10, 15, 20, 25
which is different than
10 15/25 == 10 15, 16, 17,..
-help numlist- has many more examples.
* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
Links to this post: