### Sunday, March 05, 2006

## st: RE: RE: RE: numlist abbreviations not at all interpreted differently in egenmore's eqany S8

The misleading title of this thread is being perpetuated.

The -eqany()- function of -egen- has never been part of -egenmore-, as Jennifer did point out earlier in a correction. I believe that someone posed a problem on Statalist which led to its first being written by myself in about 1998. It was formally published as part of another package, called -egenodd-, in STB-50 and then revised in STB-57, and then incorporated officially in Stata 7. In Stata 9, as part of a tidying-up of names by StataCorp provoked by Svend Juul's witty criticisms, it was renamed -anymatch()-.

To repeat, Jennifer's question was whether there is a problem with this -egen- function, and the short answer is No.

Another way to see this is to note that you can look directly at the code, as -egen- functions are all written in Stata. You need one little detail, that -egen- function -foo()- will be defined by a program in file _gfoo.ado. Thus, the prefix is always _g.

Now in Stata 9 there is an especially easy way to do this:

. viewsource _ganymatch.ado

finds the file and opens it up in the Viewer. There is more on -viewsource- in Stata Tip 30 "May the source be with you", which is in Stata Journal 6(1).

In earlier versions of Stata, you just need to find the file (e.g. with -findfile- or -which-) and open it up with the Viewer or an editor.

Here is the function code. The key point is that the -numlist- fed to -values()- is interpreted as part of the -syntax- statement. Hence if there were a problem with different kinds of numlists, it lies with -syntax-. As it happens, there is no such problem.

*! version 1.0.0 04oct2004 program define _ganymatch version 6.0, missing gettoken type 0 : 0 gettoken g 0 : 0 gettoken eqs 0 : 0 syntax varlist(min=1 numeric) [if] [in], /* */ Values(numlist int) [BY(string)] if `"`by'"' != "" { _egennoby anymatch() `"`by'"' }

tempvar touse mark `touse' `if' `in' tokenize `varlist' local nvars : word count `varlist' local nnum : word count `values' quietly { gen byte `g' = 0 /* ignore user-supplied `type' */ forval i = 1 / `nvars' { forval j = 1 / `nnum' { local nj : word `j' of `values' replace `g' = 1 if ``i'' == `nj' & `touse' } } } if length("`varlist'") >= 69 { note `g' : `varlist' == `values' label var `g' "see notes" } else if length("`varlist' == `values'") > 80 { note `g' : `varlist' == `values' label var `g' "`varlist': see notes" } else { label var `g' "`varlist' == `values'" } end

Nick n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk

Marino, Jennifer > Thanks very much for the explanation - I'm sorry for the delay in my > thanks, but I was out of town. > > I did consult -help numlist- and [U]14.1.8 before writing, I promise, > but plain failed to see that the interval was dictated by the number > listed before the range for 'to' and ':'. Boneheaded, indeed > - I think I > misread all the pertinent examples because I expected all but the > explicit interval definition (e.g. 1[10]100) to be simple range > delimiters. > > Thank you again.

Scott Merryman > > Aren't these supposed to be the same? > > > > No. For the ":" and "to" syntax, the preceding number specify the > interval used in constructing the number list. > > For example: > > 10 15 to 25 == 10, 15, 20, 25 > > which is different than > > 10 15/25 == 10 15, 16, 17,.. > > -help numlist- has many more examples.

* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

Tag: statalist