Sunday, March 05, 2006

st: Thanks, Really! => graph twoway bar horizontal vs. graph hbar

Dear Dr. Nichols, Well, e-mail communication is hard! I was not being clear in my previous note thanking YOU! I understood you first time and tried your suggestions, which worked perfectly (Well, thank you again!). I opted for the -relabel(3 "':di char(160)'"...) solution. So I was not saying your solution did not work. What I tried, but failed, to convey in my previous note was this: before I posted my question, I had tried -relabel(3 " " 6 " " 9 " ")-, which had not worked. You warned in your reply that it would not work. I was merely curious to know why -relabel(3 " " 6 " " 9 " ")- did not work; having read the Graphics manual, I felt it should have worked... Anyway, I understood you first time and thank you. Have a great Sunday. ---Hiroshi

> ------------------------------ > > Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 17:02:37 -0500 > From: "Austin Nichols" <austinnichols@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: st: Thanks => graph twoway bar horizontal vs. graph hbar > > "Didn't work" is less than informative. The solution as provided does work. > At the risk of violating the norms on reposting, I will repeat: > > The addition of > relabel(3 " " 6 " " 9 " ") > as a suboption of over() ** doesn't ** work. But this does: > relabel(3 "`: di char(160)'" 6 "`: di char(160)'" 9 "`: di char(160)'") > > On 3/4/06, Hiroshi Maeda <hmaeda1@uic.edu> wrote: >> Thank you for your help, Drs. Nichols & Cox; you have solved my >> problems. Austin, I actually tried the -relabel- suboption inside -over- >> but it did not work, as you pointed out. I wonder why. I feel the >> -relabel- suboption should have solved my problem #2. Am I missing >> something or is this a problem in Stata? ---Hiroshi

* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


Tag:


Links to this post:

Create a Link



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?